ClusterOS Regional Diagnostic
Greater Glasgow
Greater Glasgow's innovation footprint draws £4.56bn of UKRI lead-led funding across 5,718 grants spanning 6 active clusters, with Greater Glasgow Digital Creative (24%) the largest single cluster and Glasgow (30%) the dominant regional anchor by UKRI £. 55 Companies House-traced spin-outs region-wide translate to £83m UKRI per spin-out.
The region shows medium-confidence "Coordination–Intermediation" and "Extraction–Intermediation" stabilisation stacks at ecosystem grain — intermediaries cluster around incumbent anchors, absorbing the coordination load that would otherwise force a redesign of how value flows between universities, public funders and corporate spin-out activity. Pipeline 1 evidence: infrastructure deployment 2015-2024 across multiple clusters, support-programme establishment 1998-2024 and 2024 activity concentration all re-evidence "Re-proving instead of narrowing" behaviour; University of Strathclyde appears as institutional anchor across the constituent sub-clusters as ecosystem-level intermediation.
Tap diagram to enlarge
Same data examined through five diagnostic lenses — Pipeline, Leverage, Triple Helix, Throughput, Collaboration. The interactive diagnostic is currently in private preview.
Sources: UKRI Gateway to Research (grants, outcomes); OpenAlex (publications); Companies House (spin-out lifecycle); DSIT (cluster mapping); Public investment data. Snapshot May 2026.
| Cluster | Regime | Dominant stalls | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Greater Glasgow Digital Creative | Extraction-Narrative | Re-proving Instead of Narrowing, Extracting Without Reinvesting, Mediating Instead of Coupling | 107 |
| Greater Glasgow Advanced Manufacturing | Extraction-Narrative | Coordinating Instead of Deciding, Extracting Without Reinvesting, Stabilising Around Incumbents | 92 |
| Greater Glasgow Life Sciences | Extraction-Narrative | Re-proving Instead of Narrowing, Coordinating Instead of Deciding, Extracting Without Reinvesting | 95 |
| Greater Glasgow Space | Permission-Validation | Re-proving Instead of Narrowing, Coordinating Instead of Deciding, Stabilising Around Incumbents | 67 |
| Greater Glasgow Net Zero | Volume-Tolerance | Stabilising Around Incumbents, Re-proving Instead of Narrowing, Coordinating Instead of Deciding | 94 |
| Greater Glasgow Fintech | Extraction-Intermediary | Re-proving Instead of Narrowing, Coordinating Instead of Deciding, Extracting Without Reinvesting | 168 |
Dominant stacks · Most common stabilisation patterns in the region
Value extraction events generate narrative about ecosystem success; narrative legitimises continued extraction by framing it as ecosystem contribution; uncertainty about whether extraction is harmful absorbed by the success narrative.
Intermediaries produce narrative about their facilitation role; narrative legitimises intermediary existence and funding; uncertainty about direct coupling absorbed by narrative rather than demonstration.
Top leverage hypotheses
"If annual ecosystem reports (e.g., by Scottish Enterprise or Glasgow City Innovation District) separated extraction metrics (graduate hiring by non-local corporates, IP licensing to external entities) from retention metrics (local startup formation, local reinvestment), it might reduce the system's ability to absorb success signals through narrative without making the difference between value creation and value capture visible."
"If one ecosystem reporting body (e.g., Scottish Enterprise annual report) published separate metrics for value extraction (capital raised by companies, employment by companies, with destination geography) and value retention (local employment, local procurement, local IP licensing), it might make the difference visible and reduce uncertainty absorption through aggregated success narratives."
"If ecosystem reports (e.g., from Scottish Enterprise, Life Sciences Scotland, or GCID) separated "value created" metrics (spin-offs formed, equity raised, patents filed) from "value retained" metrics (companies headquartered in cluster, employment in cluster, procurement from cluster suppliers), it might reduce the system's ability to absorb success and uncertainty signals through aggregated success narratives without making the distinction between extraction and retention visible and testable."